Copy this text
Willingness to pay to conserve Mediterranean marine fauna (Actinopterygii, Chondrichthyes, Mammalia, Reptilia) in France
The willingness to pay (WTP) of people to protect animal populations can be used as a tool for these populations’ conservation. The WTP reflects the non-use value of animals, which can be significant for charismatic species. This value can be used as an economic criterion for decision-makers in order to recommend protective measures. The definition of the WTP to protect a species is challenging, as valuation methods are time-consuming and expensive. To overcome these limitations, we built a benefit transfer function based on 112 valuation studies and apply it to 440 Mediterranean marine species. We extracted these species from the IUCN database and retrieved some required parameters from, amongst others, the FishBase database. Marine mammals appear to have the highest WTP value followed in order by sea turtles, sharks and rays, and ray-finned fishes. Commercial fish species appear to have the highest values amongst the fish class.
Disciplines
Human activities, Environment
Keywords
Marine species, Mediterranean, Actinopterygii, Chondrichthyes, Mammalia, Reptilia, Willingness to pay, Non-use value, Benefit transfer
Location
49.30626N, 27.058682S, 36.20932E, -3.302568W
Devices
1) DATABASES
We propose here two databases:
1.1) 2017_WTP_LITERATURE_DATABASE
This database describes the variables used to build the benefit transfer function. We built this database using Amuakwa-Mensah database and the USGS Benefit Transfer Toolkit, and by consolidating these databases with a literature review. The CSV file contains all the variables required to build the benefit transfer function using the R code below (parameters are set as dummy variables).
/////
## CHOOSE DIRECTORY
setwd("~/CHOOSE DIRECTORY")
#PACKAGES
library(Hmisc)
library(corrplot)
#1_BENEFIT TRANSFER FUNCTION BUILDING
WTP_database<-read.table("2017_WTP_LITERATURE_DATABASE.txt",h=T) ##database loading
linearMod <- lm(ln_WTP ~ ToC_No_dim + Local_Stat_No+ SurvTyp_face2face + SurvTyp_Internet + SurvTyp_Mix + SurvTyp_Phone + ln_GDP_PPP + ValuationMethod_CE + ValuationMethod_Hybrid + mod_Trustfund + mod_bill + mod_Unspecified + mod_Membership + Freq_Monthly + Freq_Once + Freq_Unspec + Units_perPerson + Class_bird + Class_MarinFish + Class_Freshwaterfish + Class_freshwaterMammal + Class_MarineRiv_fish + Class_MarineReptile + Class_TerrestrialMammal + ln_Mean_Lenght + ln_Mean_Weight,data=WTP_database) # build linear regression model on database
print(linearMod)
summary(linearMod)
////
Field of the CSV file :
Reference : source of the information
Location : Location of the study
SiteName : Location of the study (more detailed)
PrimarySpecies : Studied species
TypeofChange_mod : Type of change in the conservation status aimed
ToC_No_dim : Type of change in the conservation status aimed (dummy : increase (ref) vs. no depletion)
Local_Stat : Local Endangerement status
Local_Stat_No: Local Endangerement status (dummy: endangered (ref) vs. not endangered)
SurvTyp: Type of survey
SurvTyp_face2face: Type of survey (dummy: mail (ref) vs. face2face vs. internet vs. mixed vs. phone)
SurvTyp_Internet: Type of survey (dummy: mail (ref) vs. face2face vs. internet vs. mixed vs. phone)
SurvTyp_Mix: Type of survey (dummy: mail (ref) vs. face2face vs. internet vs. mixed vs. phone)
SurvTyp_Phone: Type of survey (dummy: mail (ref) vs. face2face vs. internet vs. mixed vs. phone)
GDP_PPP: Country GDP-PPP at the time of the study
ln_GDP_PPP: Logarithm of the country GDP-PPP at the time of the study
YearDataWereCollected: Year of the data collection
SampleFrame_mod: Sample frame as the type of respondent
SampleFrame_vis: Sample frame as the type of respondent (dummy: resident (ref) vs. visitor)
ValuationMethod: Valuation Method
ValuationMethod_CE: Valuation Method (dummy: CMV (ref) vs. CE vs. hybrid)
ValuationMethod_Hybrid: Valuation Method (dummy: CMV (ref) vs. CE vs. hybrid)
Way_mod: Way of payment
mod_Trustfund: Way of payment (dummy: tax (ref) vs. bill vs. unspecified vs. membership)
mod_bill: Way of payment (dummy: tax (ref) vs. bill vs. unspecified vs. membership)
mod_Unspecified: Way of payment (dummy: tax (ref) vs. bill vs. unspecified vs. membership)
mod_Membership: Way of payment (dummy: tax (ref) vs. bill vs. unspecified vs. membership)
Freq_mod: Frequency of payment
Freq_Monthly: Frequency of payment (dummy: annual (ref) vs. monthly vs. once vs. per visit vs. unspecified)
Freq_Once: Frequency of payment (dummy: annual (ref) vs. monthly vs. once vs. per visit vs. unspecified)
Freq_pervisit: Frequency of payment (dummy: annual (ref) vs. monthly vs. once vs. per visit vs. unspecified)
Freq_Unspec: Frequency of payment (dummy: annual (ref) vs. monthly vs. once vs. per visit vs. unspecified)
WTP: WTP results of the original study (corrected for inflation to the year 2017)
ln_WTP: Logarithm of the WTP results of the original study (corrected for inflation to the year 2017)
Units_mod: Unit of the willingness to pay ($ per person, household or per visit)
Units_perPerson: Unit of the willingness to pay (dummy: per household (ref) vs. per person vs. per visit)
Units_pervisit: Unit of the willingness to pay (dummy: per household (ref) vs. per person vs. per visit)
Animal_class: Animal class
Class_bird: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)
Class_MarinFish: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)
Class_Freshwaterfish: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)
Class_freshwaterMammal: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)
Class_MarineRiv_fish: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)
Class_MarineReptile: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)
Class_TerrestrialMammal: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)
Mean_Lenght: Mean length (m)
ln_Mean_Lenght: Logarithm of the mean length
Mean_Weight: Mean weight (kg)
ln_Mean_Weight: Logarithm of the mean weight
1.2) 2017_WTP_MARINE_SPECIES_FRANCE
We extracted marine species form the IUCN database and only selected the ones belonging to the following group: Actinopterygii, Chondrichthyes, Mammalia, Reptilia. We extracted the average length and weight form the FishBase database (Actinopterygii, Chondrichthyes), Shirihai and Jarrett (2007; Mammalia) and Sea Turtle Conservancy database (Reptilia). We then applied the benefit transfer function (1) in order to calculate the WTP to conserve each species based on an annual tax payment per person in France. To be noted that the WTP for another country can be calculated by applying the relevant GDP-PPP to the benefit transfer function.
Field of the CSV file :
internalTaxonId: Identification from IUCN
kingdomName: Species kingdom
phylumName: Species phylum
orderName: Species order
className: Species class
familyName: Species family
genusName: Species genus
speciesName: Species
Genus_species: Genus species
redlistCategory_Local: Endangerment at the local scale
redlistCategory: Endangerment at the international scale
populationTrend: Global trend
Local_Stat_No(combined): Endangerment at the local or international scale (if the local scale is not available) (dummy: endangered (ref) vs. not endangered)
Class_bird: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)
Class_MarinFish: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)
Class_Freshwaterfish: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)
Class_freshwaterMammal: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)
Class_MarineRiv_fish: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)
Class_MarineReptile: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)
Class_TerrestrialMammal: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)
Class_Other: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)
Class_MarinFish: Animal class (dummy: marine mammal (ref) vs. bird vs. marine fish vs. freshwater fish vs. freshwater mammal vs. diadromous fish vs. marine reptile vs. terrestrial mammal)
GDP_PPP_France: France GDP-PPP in 2017
Lmean: Mean length (m)
Wmean: Mean weigth (kg)
WTP_france_conser: WTP to conserve a population per year per person
2) LIMITATIONS AND WARNINGS
The values in the 2017_WTP_MARINE_SPECIES_FRANCE file can only be used separately in valuation processes, as these values are not additive (Beaumont, 2008). However, they can be used simultaneously as an indicator of people’s preferences for protecting a population in comparison to others (see figure provided).
To be noted that values for anguilliform fishes are to be taken with caution. As no species were comparable in terms of characteristics for building the benefit transfer function, the values for these species might be biased. The author might have eluded similar biases for other species. Dedicated studies to refine the results might be required for some species; this database only provides some basic values.